Simple Spelling = Better Spelling?
I don’t think so. I’ve been reading about the ‘simple spelling movement‘ where they claim that words should be spelled easier and/or simpler. Generally, phonetically. But whose phonics are we going to be using? Here, when I do laundry, I do the ‘wash’. In parts of the country, they do the ‘warsh’. So whose spelling would be used there?
Does ‘dance’ rhyme with ‘romance’ and should it have similar spelling? What about ’sure’, ’shore’, ‘zoo’ and ‘pleasure’. Should the ’s’ in ‘pleasure’ be grouped with the z of zoo, the s/sh of sure and shore… or is it its own sound entirely?
Maybe some day ‘thru’ will replace ‘through’ (though I hope not), but I think it’s foolish and stupid to attempt to change all odd spellings all at once. If you change all spellings, you will loose a lot of etymology.
For example, do you know why ’segue’ is pronounced ’seg-way’ instead of something like ’seg-oo’? Segue comes to English from Italian, via music. In Italian, the ‘gu’ grouping is always pronounced ‘gw’ as in ‘anguished’ and since all vowels are always pronounced, the ‘e’ is also tacked on. Thus, you get ’se-gw-e’. You’d lose that interesting bit if you started spelling it something like ’segway’.
I like etymology.







(pronounced mei wèi), a composite of ‘beautiful’ + ‘food’ according to my FireFox Chinese dictionary extension (DictCN - I knew having all these extensions was going to come in handy!). Or, yes, ‘delicious’ when taken together.
. Well, at least they got the pronunciation correct. But what do the Chinese characters mean!?
